↓ Skip to main content

Body mass index is negatively associated with telomere length: a collaborative cross-sectional meta-analysis of 87 observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Body mass index is negatively associated with telomere length: a collaborative cross-sectional meta-analysis of 87 observational studies
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2018
DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqy107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marij Gielen, Geja J Hageman, Evangelia E Antoniou, Katarina Nordfjall, Massimo Mangino, Muthuswamy Balasubramanyam, Tim de Meyer, Audrey E Hendricks, Erik J Giltay, Steven C Hunt, Jennifer A Nettleton, Klelia D Salpea, Vanessa A Diaz, Ramin Farzaneh-Far, Gil Atzmon, Sarah E Harris, Lifang Hou, David Gilley, Iiris Hovatta, Jeremy D Kark, Hisham Nassar, David J Kurz, Karen A Mather, Peter Willeit, Yun-Ling Zheng, Sofia Pavanello, Ellen W Demerath, Line Rode, Daniel Bunout, Andrew Steptoe, Lisa Boardman, Amelia Marti, Belinda Needham, Wei Zheng, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Andrew J Pellatt, Jaakko Kaprio, Jonathan N Hofmann, Christian Gieger, Giuseppe Paolisso, Jacob B H Hjelmborg, Lisa Mirabello, Teresa Seeman, Jason Wong, Pim van der Harst, Linda Broer, Florian Kronenberg, Barbara Kollerits, Timo Strandberg, Dan T A Eisenberg, Catherine Duggan, Josine E Verhoeven, Roxanne Schaakxs, Raffaela Zannolli, Rosana M R dos Reis, Fadi J Charchar, Maciej Tomaszewski, Ute Mons, Ilja Demuth, Andrea Elena Iglesias Molli, Guo Cheng, Dmytro Krasnienkov, Bianca D'Antono, Marek Kasielski, Barry J McDonnell, Richard Paul Ebstein, Kristina Sundquist, Guillaume Pare, Michael Chong, Maurice P Zeegers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 8 17%
Professor 6 13%
Unspecified 5 11%
Other 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 19%
Unspecified 9 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Other 9 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#704,643
of 13,495,245 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,803
of 9,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,244
of 264,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#26
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,495,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.