Title |
Stuck in the catch 22: attitudes towards smoking cessation among populations vulnerable to social disadvantage
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Addiction (to Alcohol & Other Drugs), January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1111/add.13253 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kelsey Pateman, Pauline Ford, Lisa Fizgerald, Allyson Mutch, Kym Yuke, Billie Bonevski, Coral Gartner |
Abstract |
To explore how smoking and smoking cessation is perceived within the context of disadvantage, across a broad cross section of defined populations vulnerable to social disadvantage. Qualitative focus groups with participants recruited through community service organisations (CSO). Metropolitan and regional settings in Queensland, Australia. Focus groups were held at the respective CSO facilities. Fifty-six participants across nine focus groups, including people living with mental illness, people experiencing or at risk of homelessness (adult and youth populations), people living with HIV, people living in a low income area and Indigenous Australians. Thematic, in-depth analysis of focus group discussions. Participant demographic information and smoking history was recorded. Smoking behaviour, smoking identity and feelings about smoking were reflective of individual circumstances and social and environmental context. Participants felt 'trapped' in smoking because they felt unable to control the stressful life circumstances that triggered and sustained their smoking. Smoking cessation was viewed as an individual's responsibility, which was at odds with participants' statements about the broader factors outside of their own control that were responsible for their smoking. Highly disadvantaged smokers' views on smoking involve contradictions between feeling that smoking cessation involves personal responsibility while at the same time feeling trapped by stressful life circumstances. Tobacco control programs aiming to reduce smoking among disadvantaged groups are unlikely to be successful unless the complex interplay of social factors is carefully considered. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
United States | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 21% |
Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 16% |
Unspecified | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 13 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 18% |
Unspecified | 10 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
Other | 9 | 16% |