You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid functional genetics of the oligodendrocyte lineage using pluripotent stem cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-06102-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela M. Lager, Olivia G. Corradin, Jared M. Cregg, Matthew S. Elitt, H. Elizabeth Shick, Benjamin L. L. Clayton, Kevin C. Allan, Hannah E. Olsen, Mayur Madhavan, Paul J. Tesar |
| Abstract |
Oligodendrocyte dysfunction underlies many neurological disorders, but rapid assessment of mutation-specific effects in these cells has been impractical. To enable functional genetics in oligodendrocytes, here we report a highly efficient method for generating oligodendrocytes and their progenitors from mouse embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells, independent of mouse strain or mutational status. We demonstrate that this approach, when combined with genome engineering, provides a powerful platform for the expeditious study of genotype-phenotype relationships in oligodendrocytes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 42% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 64% |
| Scientists | 10 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 24 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#506,950
of 25,387,480 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,613
of 56,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,905
of 344,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#235
of 1,449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.