You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing the validity of crowdsourced wildlife observations for conservation using public participatory mapping methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Conservation, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.016 |
Authors |
Greg Brown, Clive McAlpine, Jonathan Rhodes, Daniel Lunney, Ross Goldingay, Kelly Fielding, Scott Hetherington, Marama Hopkins, Clare Manning, Mathew Wood, Angie Brace, Lorraine Vass |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 19% |
Unknown | 35 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 19 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Computer Science | 7 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 40 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,440,254
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,782
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,722
of 366,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#55
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.