↓ Skip to main content

Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0653-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam R. Brentnall, Elaine F. Harkness, Susan M. Astley, Louise S. Donnelly, Paula Stavrinos, Sarah Sampson, Lynne Fox, Jamie C. Sergeant, Michelle N. Harvie, Mary Wilson, Ursula Beetles, Soujanya Gadde, Yit Lim, Anil Jain, Sara Bundred, Nicola Barr, Valerie Reece, Anthony Howell, Jack Cuzick, D. Gareth R. Evans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 46 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,111,563
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#193
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,333
of 395,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.