↓ Skip to main content

Interneuron Transplantation as a Treatment for Epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interneuron Transplantation as a Treatment for Epilepsy
Published in
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, December 2015
DOI 10.1101/cshperspect.a022376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert F. Hunt, Scott C. Baraban

Abstract

Stem-cell therapy has extraordinary potential to address critical, unmet needs in the treatment of human disease. One particularly promising approach for the treatment of epilepsy is to increase inhibition in areas of the epileptic brain by grafting new inhibitory cortical interneurons. When grafted from embryos, young γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic precursors disperse, functionally mature into host brain circuits as local-circuit interneurons, and can stop seizures in both genetic and acquired forms of the disease. These features make interneuron cell transplantation an attractive new approach for the treatment of intractable epilepsies, as well as other brain disorders that involve increased risk for epilepsy as a comorbidity. Here, we review recent efforts to isolate and transplant cortical interneuron precursors derived from embryonic mouse and human cell sources. We also discuss some of the important challenges that must be addressed before stem-cell-based treatment for human epilepsy is realized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 19 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Engineering 5 7%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,631,947
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine
#179
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,168
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.