Title |
Prevalence, incidence, and age at diagnosis in Marfan Syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-015-0369-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kristian A. Groth, Hanne Hove, Kasper Kyhl, Lars Folkestad, Mette Gaustadnes, Niels Vejlstrup, Kirstine Stochholm, John R. Østergaard, Niels H. Andersen, Claus H. Gravholt |
Abstract |
Marfan syndrome is a genetic disorder with considerable morbidity and mortality. Presently, clinicians use the 2010 revised Ghent nosology, which includes optional genetic sequencing of the FBN1 gene, to diagnose patients. So far, only a few studies based on older diagnostic criteria have reported a wide range of prevalence and incidence. Our aim was to study prevalence, incidence, and age at diagnosis in patients with Marfan syndrome. Using unique Danish patient-registries, we identified all possible Marfan syndrome patients recorded by the Danish healthcare system (1977-2014). Following, we confirmed or rejected the diagnosis according to the 2010 revised Ghent nosology. We identified a total of 1628 persons with possible Marfan syndrome. We confirmed the diagnosis in 412, whereof 46 were deceased, yielding a maximum prevalence of 6.5/100,000 at the end of 2014. The annual median incidence was 0.19/100,000 (range: 0.0-0.7) which increased significantly with an incidence rate ratio of 1.03 (95 % CI: 1.02-1.04, p < 0.001). We found a median age at diagnose of 19.0 years (range: 0.0-74). The age at diagnosis increased during the study period, uninfluenced by the changes in diagnostic criteria. We found no gender differences. The increasing prevalence of Marfan syndrome during the study period is possibly due to build-up of a registry. Since early diagnosis is essential in preventing aortic events, diagnosing Marfan syndrome remains a task for both pediatricians and physicians caring for adults. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 155 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 22% |
Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
Researcher | 14 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 15% |
Unknown | 38 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 10% |
Unknown | 48 | 31% |