↓ Skip to main content

Neo-Virology: the raison d'etre of viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Uirusu, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 105)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog


1 Dimensions

Readers on

5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Neo-Virology: the raison d'etre of viruses
Published in
Uirusu, January 2016
DOI 10.2222/jsv.66.155
Pubmed ID

Tokiko WATANABE, Yoshihiro KAWAOKA

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Unspecified 2 40%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
of 13,514,418 outputs
Outputs from Uirusu
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 264,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Uirusu
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,418 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them