↓ Skip to main content

The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

book_reviews
1 book reviewer

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of sign language on spoken language acquisition in children with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick, Adrienne Stevens, Chantelle Garritty, David Moher

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 101 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 13%
Researcher 13 12%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Psychology 18 17%
Linguistics 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 12 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,195,985
of 13,514,418 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#477
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,769
of 264,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,418 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.