You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
EHR based Genetic Testing Knowledge Base (iGTKB) Development
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-15-s4-s3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qian Zhu, Hongfang Liu, Christopher G Chute, Matthew Ferber |
Abstract |
The gap between a large growing number of genetic tests and a suboptimal clinical workflow of incorporating these tests into regular clinical practice poses barriers to effective reliance on advanced genetic technologies to improve quality of healthcare. A promising solution to fill this gap is to develop an intelligent genetic test recommendation system that not only can provide a comprehensive view of genetic tests as education resources, but also can recommend the most appropriate genetic tests to patients based on clinical evidence. In this study, we developed an EHR based Genetic Testing Knowledge Base for Individualized Medicine (iGTKB). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 23% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 30% |
Engineering | 5 | 12% |
Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,431,664
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,571
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,925
of 386,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#35
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.