The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enrolling Research Participants in Private Practice: Conflicts of Interest, Consistency, Therapeutic Misconception, and Informed Consent
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.ecas3-1512 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Armand H Matheny Antommaria, Kristin Stanley Bramlage |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 40% |
Spain | 2 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
Scientists | 4 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,365,655
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,480
of 398,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.