↓ Skip to main content

Towards a midwifery profession in Bangladesh – a systems approach for a complex world

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a midwifery profession in Bangladesh – a systems approach for a complex world
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0740-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malin Upper Bogren, Helena Wigert, Lars Edgren, Marie Berg

Abstract

The midwifery profession is crucial for a functioning health system aiming at improved maternal and child health outcomes. Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) can be used as a tool to understand actors' interactions in the system around midwifery profession for improved maternal and child health. The purpose of this study is to explore how actors connect to promote the Bangladesh's midwifery profession. An explorative study based on the framework of CAS was performed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 16 key persons representing nine different organisations promoting the establishment of the midwifery profession. Qualitative analysis was used. Findings show that the actors were intertwined and driving towards a common goal; to save lives through education and deployment of 3000 midwives. The unique knowledge contributions of everyone involved were giving the system strength and power to perform. Collaboration was seen as more could be achieved compared to what an individual organisation could do. Significant results of this were that two midwifery curricula and faculty development had been produced. Although collaboration was mostly seen as something positive to move the system forward, the approach to reach the set goal varied with different interests, priorities and concerns, both on individual organisational level as well as at system level. Frequent struggles of individual philosophies versus organisational mandates were seen as competing interests for advancing the national priorities. It would appear that newcomers with innovative ideas were denied access on the same terms as other actors. This study illustrates that CAS thinking can be used as a metaphor to understand how to adapt more emergent ways of working instead of the traditional planned approaches to change and develop in order to deal better with a more complex world. Through examining how actors connect for establishing a midwifery profession, offers insights of shared interests towards stepping up efforts for a competent midwifery profession in Bangladesh and elsewhere. Good relationships, where everyone's expertise and innovations, are used to the full, are crucial for establishing a strong midwifery profession and thus improved maternal and child health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Psychology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,632,370
of 24,355,571 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,392
of 4,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,999
of 396,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#38
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,355,571 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.