↓ Skip to main content

The impact of fire on riparian vegetation in Australia’s tropical savanna

Overview of attention for article published in Freshwater Science, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of fire on riparian vegetation in Australia’s tropical savanna
Published in
Freshwater Science, December 2015
DOI 10.1086/684074
Authors

Michael M. Douglas, Samantha A. Setterfield, Keith McGuinness, Philip S. Lake

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Researcher 4 19%
Unspecified 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 29%
Unspecified 4 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,917,923
of 6,647,401 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Science
#239
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,013
of 278,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Science
#23
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,647,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.