↓ Skip to main content

Ciliopathies - from rare inherited cystic kidney diseases to basic cellular function

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ciliopathies - from rare inherited cystic kidney diseases to basic cellular function
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40348-015-0019-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Habbig, Max Christoph Liebau

Abstract

Primary cilia are membrane-bound microtubule-based protuberances of the cell membrane projecting to the extracellular environment. While little attention was paid to this subcellular structure over a long time, recent research has highlighted multiple cellular functions of primary cilia and has brought cilia to the focus of medical and cell biological research. Cilia are nowadays considered to be crucial cellular structures controlling diverse intracellular signaling cascades. Dysfunction of cilia leads to a pleiotropic group of diseases ranging from cystic kidney disease via neurologic disorders to metabolic phenotypes and cardiac malformations. According to the underlying cellular pathophysiology, these diverse disorders have been subsumed under the term "ciliopathies". The work on rare human ciliopathies has strongly deepened our genetic and cell biological understanding of multiple diseases and cellular events thus ultimately leading to clinical trials of novel therapeutic approaches. This review focuses on some of the important developments in ciliopathy research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 21%
Computer Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,559,237
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics
#14
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,210
of 266,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them