↓ Skip to main content

A Hybrid Model for Mapping Relative Differences in Belowground Biomass and Root: Shoot Ratios Using Spectral Reflectance, Foliar N and Plant Biophysical Data within Coastal Marsh

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
A Hybrid Model for Mapping Relative Differences in Belowground Biomass and Root: Shoot Ratios Using Spectral Reflectance, Foliar N and Plant Biophysical Data within Coastal Marsh
Published in
Remote Sensing, December 2015
DOI 10.3390/rs71215837
Authors

Jessica O’Connell, Kristin Byrd, Maggi Kelly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 47%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,920,095
of 6,650,505 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#997
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,781
of 279,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#78
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,650,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.