You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical review: Canadian National Advisory Committee on Blood and Blood Products - Massive Transfusion Consensus Conference 2011: report of the panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc10498 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter H Dzik, Morris A Blajchman, Dean Fergusson, Morad Hameed, Blair Henry, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Teresa Korogyi, Sarvesh Logsetty, Robert C Skeate, Simon Stanworth, Charles MacAdams, Brian Muirhead |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 55 | 30% |
| Unknown | 15 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 78% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,273,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,650
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,117
of 251,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.