↓ Skip to main content

Optimal intensity and type of leg exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimal intensity and type of leg exercise training for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008008.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahizan Zainuldin, Martin G Mackey, Jennifer A Alison

Abstract

Intensity of exercise is considered a key determinant of training response, however, no systematic review has investigated the effects of different levels of training intensity on exercise capacity, functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As type of training (continuous or interval) may also affect training response, the effects of the type of training in COPD also require investigation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 221 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 19%
Sports and Recreations 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 55 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,574,609
of 19,188,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,779
of 11,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,896
of 232,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,188,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.