Title |
Left Ventricular Mass Indexing in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: A Simplified Approach for the Identification of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Clinical Practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pediatrics, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.10.085 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcello Chinali, Francesco Emma, Claudia Esposito, Gabriele Rinelli, Alessio Franceschini, Anke Doyon, Francesca Raimondi, Giacomo Pongiglione, Franz Schaefer, Maria Chiara Matteucci |
Abstract |
To determine a simplified method to identify presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in pediatric populations because the relationship between heart growth and body growth in children has made indexing difficult for younger ages. Healthy children (n = 400; 52% boys, 0-18 years of age) from 2 different European hospitals were studied to derive a simplified formula. Left ventricular mass (LVM) was calculated according to the Devereux formula. The derived approach to index LVM was tested on a validation cohort of 130 healthy children from a different hospital center. There was a strong nonlinear correlation between height and LVM. LVM was best related to height to a power of 2.16 with a correction factor of 0.09. Analysis of residuals for LVM/[(height(2.16)) + 0.09] showed an homoscedastic distribution in both sexes throughout the entire height range. A partition value of 45 g/m(2.16) was defined as the upper normal limit for LVM index. As opposed to formula suggested by current guidelines (ie, LVM/height(2.7)) when applying the proposed approach in the validation cohort of 130 healthy participants, no false positives for LVH were found (0% vs 8%; P < .01). Our data support the possibility to have a single partition (ie, 45 g/m(2.16)) value across the whole pediatric age range to identify LVH, without the time-consuming need of computing specific percentiles for height and sex. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 25% |
Ecuador | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 11 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Other | 17 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 52% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 24% |