| Title |
Harnessing patient feedback data: A challenge for policy and service improvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
DIGITAL HEALTH, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1177/2055207615617910 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Powell, Anne-Marie Boylan, Felix Greaves |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,388,593
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from DIGITAL HEALTH
#182
of 857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,352
of 395,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from DIGITAL HEALTH
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them