↓ Skip to main content

Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization
Published in
Nature Climate Change, December 2015
DOI 10.1038/nclimate2879
Authors

W. Kolby Smith, Sasha C. Reed, Cory C. Cleveland, Ashley P. Ballantyne, William R. L. Anderegg, William R. Wieder, Yi Y. Liu, Steven W. Running

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 345 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 103 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 28%
Student > Master 25 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 39 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 97 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 95 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 18%
Engineering 12 3%
Social Sciences 3 <1%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 67 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#124,007
of 17,673,294 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#512
of 3,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,971
of 374,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#17
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,673,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.