↓ Skip to main content

Combined obliquity and precession pacing of late Pleistocene deglaciations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined obliquity and precession pacing of late Pleistocene deglaciations
Published in
Nature, December 2011
DOI 10.1038/nature10626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Huybers

Abstract

Milankovitch proposed that Earth resides in an interglacial state when its spin axis both tilts to a high obliquity and precesses to align the Northern Hemisphere summer with Earth's nearest approach to the Sun. This general concept has been elaborated into hypotheses that precession, obliquity or combinations of both could pace deglaciations during the late Pleistocene. Earlier tests have shown that obliquity paces the late Pleistocene glacial cycles but have been inconclusive with regard to precession, whose shorter period of about 20,000 years makes phasing more sensitive to timing errors. No quantitative test has provided firm evidence for a dual effect. Here I show that both obliquity and precession pace late Pleistocene glacial cycles. Deficiencies in time control that have long stymied efforts to establish orbital effects on deglaciation are overcome using a new statistical test that focuses on maxima in orbital forcing. The results are fully consistent with Milankovitch's proposal but also admit the possibility that long Southern Hemisphere summers contribute to deglaciation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 263 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 23%
Researcher 64 23%
Student > Master 24 9%
Professor 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 40 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 167 59%
Environmental Science 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 57 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#858,599
of 23,555,482 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,057
of 92,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,138
of 244,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#334
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,555,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.