↓ Skip to main content

Hedge Funds and Stock Market Efficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Management Science, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hedge Funds and Stock Market Efficiency
Published in
Management Science, December 2015
DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2037
Authors

Joni Kokkonen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 65%
Professor 4 17%
Unspecified 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 52%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 35%
Unspecified 4 17%
Computer Science 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,137,086
of 8,084,529 outputs
Outputs from Management Science
#1,032
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,953
of 300,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Management Science
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,084,529 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.