↓ Skip to main content

Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve the Predictive Accuracy of Clinician-Reported Adverse Events

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve the Predictive Accuracy of Clinician-Reported Adverse Events
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, December 2011
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djr493
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Basch, A. Bennett, M. C. Pietanza

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 15%
Unspecified 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Other 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 44%
Unspecified 10 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 5 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,306,916
of 12,028,010 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,252
of 6,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,752
of 257,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#15
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,028,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.