You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential effects of medium- and long-chain saturated fatty acids on blood lipid profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcn/nqy167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nisha Panth, Kylie A Abbott, Cintia B Dias, Katie Wynne, Manohar L Garg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Poland | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,125,878
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#5,715
of 12,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,757
of 351,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#50
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.