You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social media interventions for precision public health: promises and risks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Digital Medicine, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41746-018-0054-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam G. Dunn, Kenneth D. Mandl, Enrico Coiera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 31% |
| Australia | 11 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 49% |
| Scientists | 26 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#714,448
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from npj Digital Medicine
#219
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,216
of 352,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Digital Medicine
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.