You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vegetarian Diets and the Risk of Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Diabetes Reports, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11892-018-1070-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa D. Olfert, Rachel A. Wattick |
| Abstract |
Worldwide, diabetes has increased steadily and in recent years, drastically. The majority of diabetes cases are type 2 (T2DM), caused by modifiable risk factors such as diet. Vegetarian diets have been studied over the past few decades for their preventative and therapeutic effects on diabetes and may be more beneficial than medication for diabetes management. A vegetarian diet characterized by whole plant foods is most beneficial for diabetes prevention and management. Vegetarian diets are inversely associated with risk of developing diabetes independent of the positive association of meat consumption with diabetes development. Vegetarian diets range from vegan (no animal products), lacto-ovo-vegetarian (no animal meat, but consumes milk and eggs), pesco-vegetarian (consumes fish), and semi-vegetarian (occasional meat consumption). There has been an observed difference in the extent of preventative and therapeutic effects of these different types of diets. The most important aspect of any of these types of diets is emphasizing whole grains, fruits and vegetables, legumes, and nuts and reducing saturated and trans fats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 16% |
| United States | 10 | 12% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 457 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 96 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 7% |
| Unknown | 222 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 10% |
| Unknown | 233 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 475. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#57,953
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#1
of 1,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,092
of 352,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.