↓ Skip to main content

Global change and conservation triage on National Wildlife Refuges

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology and Society, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global change and conservation triage on National Wildlife Refuges
Published in
Ecology and Society, January 2015
DOI 10.5751/es-07986-200414
Authors

Fred A. Johnson, Mitchell J. Eaton, Gerard McMahon, Raye Nilius, Michael R. Bryant, David J. Case, Julien Martin, Nathan J. Wood, Laura Taylor

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 45%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Unspecified 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 25%
Unspecified 8 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,548,536
of 6,504,996 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Society
#87
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,184
of 251,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Society
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,504,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.