↓ Skip to main content

Expanding the Role of Targets in Conservation Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expanding the Role of Targets in Conservation Policy
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2018.08.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Lucie M. Bland, Brett A. Bryan, Timothy Neale, Emily Nicholson, Euan G. Ritchie, Don A. Driscoll

Abstract

Conservation targets perform beneficial auxiliary functions that are rarely acknowledged, including raising awareness, building partnerships, promoting investment, and developing new knowledge. Building on these auxiliary functions could enable more rapid progress towards current targets and inform the design of future targets.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 29%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 31%
Environmental Science 13 27%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Mathematics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,414,815
of 14,777,570 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#879
of 2,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,716
of 274,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,777,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.