↓ Skip to main content

Surgical interventions for treating distal humeral fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical interventions for treating distal humeral fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009890.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Wang, Qi Zhuo, Peifu Tang, Wei Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Postgraduate 21 13%
Unspecified 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 15 9%
Other 58 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 63%
Unspecified 31 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 10 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,143,507
of 13,220,846 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,065
of 10,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,463
of 355,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,220,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.