↓ Skip to main content

Cell

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Novel Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Novel Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis
Chapter number 2
Book title
Cell & Molecular Biology of Prostate Cancer
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95693-0_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-995692-3, 978-3-31-995693-0
Authors

Xavier Filella, Laura Foj, Filella, Xavier, Foj, Laura

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains as one of the most controversial issues in health care because of the dilemmas related to screening using Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA). A high number of false positive biopsies and an elevated rate of overdiagnosis are the main problems associated with PSA. New PCa biomarkers have been recently proposed to increase the predictive value of PSA. The published results showed that PCA3 score, Prostate Health Index and 4Kscore can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, outperforming better than PSA and the percentage of free PSA. Furthermore, 4Kscore provides with high accuracy an individual risk for high-grade PCa. High values of PHI are also associated with tumor aggressiveness. In contrast, the relationship of PCA3 score with aggressiveness remains controversial, with studies showing opposite conclusions. Finally, the development of molecular biology has opened the study of genes, among them TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene and miRNAs, in PCa detection and prognosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Linguistics 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,455,835
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#718
of 5,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,719
of 353,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#7
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.