↓ Skip to main content

A practical guide for performing arthrography under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance

Overview of attention for article published in Insights Into Imaging, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A practical guide for performing arthrography under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance
Published in
Insights Into Imaging, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13244-015-0442-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugen Lungu, Thomas P Moser

Abstract

We propose a practical approach for performing arthrography with fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. Different approaches to the principal joints of the upper limb (shoulder, elbow, wrist and fingers), lower limb (hip, knee, ankle and foot) as well as the facet joints of the spine are discussed and illustrated with numerous drawings. Whenever possible, we emphasise the concept of targeting articular recesses, which offers many advantages over traditional techniques aiming at the joint space. • Arthrography remains a foremost technique in musculoskeletal radiology • Most joints can be successfully accessed by targeting the articular recess • Targeting the recess offers several advantages over traditional approaches • Ultrasound-guidance is now favoured over fluoroscopy and targeting the recess is equally applicable.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 13%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Unknown 22 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,709,789
of 15,819,321 outputs
Outputs from Insights Into Imaging
#292
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,866
of 369,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights Into Imaging
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,819,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.