↓ Skip to main content

Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
59 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013086
Authors

Snezana Djurisic, Janus C Jakobsen, Sesilje B Petersen, Mette Kenfelt, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Christian Gluud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 28 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#797,076
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,512
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,859
of 342,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.