↓ Skip to main content

Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013086
Authors

Snezana Djurisic, Janus C Jakobsen, Sesilje B Petersen, Mette Kenfelt, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Christian Gluud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Other 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 5 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#823,789
of 15,858,679 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,290
of 11,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,692
of 279,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,858,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.