↓ Skip to main content

Response to “Every ROSE has its thorns”

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to “Every ROSE has its thorns”
Published in
Environmental Evidence, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13750-018-0133-3
Authors

Neal R. Haddaway, Biljana Macura, Paul Whaley, Andrew S. Pullin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 67%
Unspecified 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,252,305
of 13,543,688 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#157
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,921
of 265,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,543,688 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them