↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-1224-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Yarber, Carol A. Brownson, Rebekah R. Jacob, Elizabeth A. Baker, Ellen Jones, Carsten Baumann, Anjali D. Deshpande, Kathleen N. Gillespie, Darcell P. Scharff, Ross C. Brownson

Abstract

Evidence-based public health gives public health practitioners the tools they need to make choices based on the best and most current evidence. An evidence-based public health training course developed in 1997 by the Prevention Research Center in St. Louis has been taught by a transdisciplinary team multiple times with positive results. In order to scale up evidence-based practices, a train-the-trainer initiative was launched in 2010. This study examines the outcomes achieved among participants of courses led by trained state-level faculty. Participants from trainee-led courses in four states (Indiana, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas) over three years were asked to complete an online survey. Attempts were made to contact 317 past participants. One-hundred forty-four (50.9 %) reachable participants were included in analysis. Outcomes measured include frequency of use of materials, resources, and other skills or tools from the course; reasons for not using the materials and resources; and benefits from attending the course. Survey responses were tabulated and compared using Chi-square tests. Among the most commonly reported benefits, 88 % of respondents agreed that they acquired knowledge about a new subject, 85 % saw applications for the knowledge to their work, and 78 % agreed the course also improved abilities to make scientifically informed decisions at work. The most commonly reported reasons for not using course content as much as intended included not having enough time to implement evidence-based approaches (42 %); other staff/peers lack training (34 %); and not enough funding for continued training (34 %). The study findings suggest that utilization of course materials and teachings remains relatively high across practitioner groups, whether they were taught by the original trainers or by state-based trainers. The findings of this study suggest that train-the-trainer is an effective method for broadly disseminating evidence-based public health principles. Train-the-trainer is less costly than the traditional method and allows for courses to be tailored to local issues, thus making it a viable approach to dissemination and scale up of new public health practices.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 46 24%
Unknown 49 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Social Sciences 23 12%
Psychology 17 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 65 34%