↓ Skip to main content

Integrated, Multi-cohort Analysis Identifies Conserved Transcriptional Signatures across Multiple Respiratory Viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Immunity, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated, Multi-cohort Analysis Identifies Conserved Transcriptional Signatures across Multiple Respiratory Viruses
Published in
Immunity, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Andres-Terre, Helen M. McGuire, Yannick Pouliot, Erika Bongen, Timothy E. Sweeney, Cristina M. Tato, Purvesh Khatri

Abstract

Respiratory viral infections are a significant burden to healthcare worldwide. Many whole genome expression profiles have identified different respiratory viral infection signatures, but these have not translated to clinical practice. Here, we performed two integrated, multi-cohort analyses of publicly available transcriptional data of viral infections. First, we identified a common host signature across different respiratory viral infections that could distinguish (1) individuals with viral infections from healthy controls and from those with bacterial infections, and (2) symptomatic from asymptomatic subjects prior to symptom onset in challenge studies. Second, we identified an influenza-specific host response signature that (1) could distinguish influenza-infected samples from those with bacterial and other respiratory viral infections, (2) was a diagnostic and prognostic marker in influenza-pneumonia patients and influenza challenge studies, and (3) was predictive of response to influenza vaccine. Our results have applications in the diagnosis, prognosis, and identification of drug targets in viral infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 217 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 36 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 12%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 46 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#237,154
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Immunity
#166
of 4,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,562
of 382,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.