You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Effect of radiochemotherapy on T2* MRI in HNSCC and its relation to FMISO PET derived hypoxia and FDG PET
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-018-1134-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole Wiedenmann, Hatice Bunea, Hans C. Rischke, Andrei Bunea, Liette Majerus, Lars Bielak, Alexey Protopopov, Ute Ludwig, Martin Büchert, Christian Stoykow, Nils H. Nicolay, Wolfgang A. Weber, Michael Mix, Philipp T. Meyer, Jürgen Hennig, Michael Bock, Anca L. Grosu |
| Abstract |
Following the publication of this article [1], the authors noticed that figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 were in the incorrect order and thus had incorrect captions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,782
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,696
of 2,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,161
of 341,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#31
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.