You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
'Communicate to vaccinate' (COMMVAC). building evidence for improving communication about childhood vaccinations in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a programme of research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Lewin, Sophie Hill, Leyla H Abdullahi, Sara Bensaude de Castro Freire, Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, Claire Glenton, Gregory D Hussey, Catherine M Jones, Jessica Kaufman, Vivian Lin, Hassan Mahomed, Linda Rhoda, Priscilla Robinson, Zainab Waggie, Natalie Willis, Charles S Wiysonge |
| Abstract |
Effective provider-parent communication can improve childhood vaccination uptake and strengthen immunisation services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Building capacity to improve communication strategies has been neglected. Rigorous research exists but is not readily found or applicable to LMICs, making it difficult for policy makers to use it to inform vaccination policies and practice.The aim of this project is to build research knowledge and capacity to use evidence-based strategies for improving communication about childhood vaccinations with parents and communities in LMICs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 24% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2011.
All research outputs
#18,301,870
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,639
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,525
of 239,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.