↓ Skip to main content

The global landscape of cognition: hierarchical aggregation as an organizational principle of human cortical networks and functions

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
118 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The global landscape of cognition: hierarchical aggregation as an organizational principle of human cortical networks and functions
Published in
Scientific Reports, December 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep18112
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Taylor, J. N. Hobbs, J. Burroni, H. T. Siegelmann

Abstract

Though widely hypothesized, limited evidence exists that human brain functions organize in global gradients of abstraction starting from sensory cortical inputs. Hierarchical representation is accepted in computational networks, and tentatively in visual neuroscience, yet no direct holistic demonstrations exist in vivo. Our methods developed network models enriched with tiered directionality, by including input locations, a critical feature for localizing representation in networks generally. Grouped primary sensory cortices defined network inputs, displaying global connectivity to fused inputs. Depth-oriented networks guided analyses of fMRI databases (~17,000 experiments;~1/4 of fMRI literature). Formally, we tested whether network depth predicted localization of abstract versus concrete behaviors over the whole set of studied brain regions. For our results, new cortical graph metrics, termed network-depth, ranked all databased cognitive function activations by network-depth. Thus, we objectively sorted stratified landscapes of cognition, starting from grouped sensory inputs in parallel, progressing deeper into cortex. This exposed escalating amalgamation of function or abstraction with increasing network-depth, globally. Nearly 500 new participants confirmed our results. In conclusion, data-driven analyses defined a hierarchically ordered connectome, revealing a related continuum of cognitive function. Progressive functional abstraction over network depth may be a fundamental feature of brains, and is observed in artificial networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Japan 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 167 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 20 11%
Professor 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 35 19%
Psychology 29 16%
Neuroscience 27 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Engineering 8 4%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#401,275
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,432
of 142,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,509
of 398,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#93
of 2,737 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,737 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.