↓ Skip to main content

Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013131
Authors

Rachel Jen, Fernanda R Almeida, Penelope Brasher, Mary M Doyle-Waters, Jim Salzman, John Fleetham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#10,345,106
of 13,555,083 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,486
of 10,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,508
of 264,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,555,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.