↓ Skip to main content

Blunted Overnight Blood Pressure Dipping in Second Trimester; A Strong Predictor of Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia.

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blunted Overnight Blood Pressure Dipping in Second Trimester; A Strong Predictor of Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia.
Published in
Current Hypertension Reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.2174/1573402114666180924143801
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abo Taleb Saremi, Mohammad-Ali Shafiee, Mahdi Montazeri, Negin Rashidi, Mohammad Montazeri

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a global burden with 10 million incidence annually and 210 daily deaths worldwide. Diagnosis is mainly based on the features following full presentation. This study explored whether early pregnancy circadian changes of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) could predict preeclampsia and hypertension. In a prospective study, 294 pregnant women who were referred to Sarem Women's Hospital, Iran were recruited. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures (MAP) were recorded (diurnally and nocturnally) in each trimester. Dipping was defined as a minimum 10% decrease in blood pressure. Of the 251 women who completed the study, 25 percent (n=63) experienced blunted MAP dipping during sleep phases in the second trimester. Eighty nine percent (n=56) experienced hypertensive disorder in the third trimester, one third of which experienced preeclampsia. Of the women with normal MAP dipping (n=188), 5 percent (n=10) had gestational hypertension and 1 percent (n=2) became preeclamptic. (P<0.0001) Conclusion: This study clearly demonstrated blunted blood pressure dipping overnight during the second trimester is a strong predictor of forthcoming pregnancy induced hypertension and preeclampsia. A scoring system was developed to predict hypertensive disorder and it was significantly correlated with preeclampsia occurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 19%
Decision Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reviews
#69
of 90 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#386,392
of 446,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reviews
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.