↓ Skip to main content

Speciation by host switch in brood parasitic indigobirds

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
447 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Speciation by host switch in brood parasitic indigobirds
Published in
Nature, August 2003
DOI 10.1038/nature01863
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael D. Sorenson, Kristina M. Sefc, Robert B. Payne

Abstract

A growing body of empirical and theoretical work supports the plausibility of sympatric speciation, but there remain few examples in which all the essential components of the process are well understood. The African indigobirds Vidua spp. are host-specific brood parasites. Indigobird nestlings are reared along with host young, and mimic the mouth markings of their respective hosts. As adults, male indigobirds mimic host song, whereas females use these songs to choose both their mates and the nests they parasitize. These behavioural mechanisms promote the cohesion of indigobird populations associated with a given host species, and provide a mechanism for reproductive isolation after a new host is colonized. Here we show that all indigobird species are similar genetically, but are significantly differentiated in both mitochondrial haplotype and nuclear allele frequencies. These data support a model of recent sympatric speciation. In contrast to the cuckoo Cuculus canorus, in which only female lineages are faithful to specific hosts, host switches have led to speciation in indigobirds because both males and females imprint on their hosts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Brazil 6 1%
India 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 402 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 22%
Researcher 92 21%
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Professor 29 6%
Other 81 18%
Unknown 42 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 315 70%
Environmental Science 26 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 <1%
Other 18 4%
Unknown 56 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,084,011
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#32,121
of 90,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,029
of 49,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#36
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.