↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of antievolution policies after Kitzmiller versus Dover

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
271 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
11 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolution of antievolution policies after Kitzmiller versus Dover
Published in
Science, December 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aad4057
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. J. Matzke

Abstract

A phylogeny identifies ancestors of modern creationist legislation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 271 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 469. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#30,260
of 17,420,646 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,532
of 70,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#595
of 329,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#28
of 1,115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,420,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.