↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of antievolution policies after Kitzmiller v. Dover

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
285 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
11 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
The evolution of antievolution policies after Kitzmiller v. Dover
Published in
Science, December 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aad4057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J. Matzke, Matzke, Nicholas J

Abstract

A phylogeny identifies ancestors of modern creationist legislation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 285 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 8%
Spain 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Czech Republic 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 59 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 13 18%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 61%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 16 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 484. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,591
of 11,772,624 outputs
Outputs from Science
#595
of 53,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#553
of 303,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#15
of 744 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,772,624 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 744 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.