↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of antievolution policies after Kitzmiller versus Dover

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
263 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
11 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolution of antievolution policies after Kitzmiller versus Dover
Published in
Science, January 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aad4057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J. Matzke

Abstract

A phylogeny identifies ancestors of modern creationist legislation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 263 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 14%
Mathematics 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 463. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#43,595
of 21,799,263 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,900
of 76,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#669
of 358,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#27
of 1,117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,799,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.