↓ Skip to main content

PlantDB – a versatile database for managing plant research

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PlantDB – a versatile database for managing plant research
Published in
Plant Methods, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-4-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivien Exner, Matthias Hirsch-Hoffmann, Wilhelm Gruissem, Lars Hennig

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Austria 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
India 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 44 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 27%
Professor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 73%
Computer Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 3 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,174,370
of 13,560,184 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#154
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,988
of 265,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,560,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them