↓ Skip to main content

Radiation treatment monitoring using multimodal functional imaging: PET/CT (18F-Fluoromisonidazole

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiation treatment monitoring using multimodal functional imaging: PET/CT (18F-Fluoromisonidazole & 18F-Fluorocholine) and DCE-US
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0708-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia Arteaga-Marrero, Cecilie Brekke Rygh, Jose F. Mainou-Gomez, Tom C. H. Adamsen, Nataliya Lutay, Rolf K. Reed, Dag R. Olsen

Abstract

This study aims to assess the effect of radiation treatment on the tumour vasculature and its downstream effects on hypoxia and choline metabolism using a multimodal approach in the murine prostate tumour model CWR22. Functional parameters derived from Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computer Tomography (CT) with (18)F-Fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) and (18)F-Fluorocholine ((18)F-FCH) as well as Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) were employed to determine the relationship between metabolic parameters and microvascular parameters that reflect the tumour microenvironment. Immunohistochemical analysis was employed for validation. PET/CT and DCE-US were acquired pre- and post-treatment, at day 0 and day 3, respectively. At day 1, radiation treatment was delivered as a single fraction of 10 Gy. Two experimental groups were tested for treatment response with (18)F-FMISO and (18)F-FCH. The maximum Standardized Uptake Values (SUVmax) and the mean SUV (SUVmean) for the (18)F-FMISO group were decreased after treatment, and the SUVmean of the tumour-to-muscle ratio was correlated to microvessel density (MVD) at day 3. The kurtosis of the amplitude of the contrast uptake A was significantly decreased for the control tumours in the (18)F-FCH group. Furthermore, the eliminating rate constant of the contrast agent from the plasma k el derived from DCE-US was negatively correlated to the SUVmean of tumour-to-muscle ratio, necrosis and MVD. The present study suggests that the multimodal approach using (18)F-FMISO PET/CT and DCE-US seems reliable in the assessment of both microvasculature and necrosis as validated by histology. Thus, it has valuable diagnostic and prognostic potential for early non-invasive evaluation of radiotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Librarian 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 7 32%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Unspecified 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#13,045,234
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,479
of 4,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,403
of 390,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#22
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.