↓ Skip to main content

Min-redundancy and max-relevance multi-view feature selection for predicting ovarian cancer survival using multi-omics data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Min-redundancy and max-relevance multi-view feature selection for predicting ovarian cancer survival using multi-omics data
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12920-018-0388-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasser EL-Manzalawy, Tsung-Yu Hsieh, Manu Shivakumar, Dokyoon Kim, Vasant Honavar

Abstract

Large-scale collaborative precision medicine initiatives (e.g., The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)) are yielding rich multi-omics data. Integrative analyses of the resulting multi-omics data, such as somatic mutation, copy number alteration (CNA), DNA methylation, miRNA, gene expression, and protein expression, offer tantalizing possibilities for realizing the promise and potential of precision medicine in cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment by substantially improving our understanding of underlying mechanisms as well as the discovery of novel biomarkers for different types of cancers. However, such analyses present a number of challenges, including heterogeneity, and high-dimensionality of omics data. We propose a novel framework for multi-omics data integration using multi-view feature selection. We introduce a novel multi-view feature selection algorithm, MRMR-mv, an adaptation of the well-known Min-Redundancy and Maximum-Relevance (MRMR) single-view feature selection algorithm to the multi-view setting. We report results of experiments using an ovarian cancer multi-omics dataset derived from the TCGA database on the task of predicting ovarian cancer survival. Our results suggest that multi-view models outperform both view-specific models (i.e., models trained and tested using a single type of omics data) and models based on two baseline data fusion methods. Our results demonstrate the potential of multi-view feature selection in integrative analyses and predictive modeling from multi-omics data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Researcher 8 9%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 34 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Engineering 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 37 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,782
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#1,015
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,717
of 337,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.