↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of programs to promote cardiovascular health of Indigenous Australians: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of programs to promote cardiovascular health of Indigenous Australians: a systematic review
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12939-018-0867-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vainess Mbuzi, Paul Fulbrook, Melanie Jessup

Abstract

Indigenous Australians carry a greater burden of cardiovascular disease than other Australians. A variety of programs has been implemented with the broad aim of improving Indigenous cardiovascular health, however, relatively few have been evaluated rigorously. In terms of effectiveness, understanding how to best manage cardiovascular disease among this population is an important priority. The review aimed to examine the evidence relating to the effectiveness of cardiovascular programs for Indigenous Australians. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant studies, limited to those published in English between 2008 and 2017. All studies that used experimental designs and reported interventions or programs explicitly aimed at improving Indigenous cardiovascular health were considered for inclusion. Methodological quality of included studies was appraised using design-specific Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. Data were extracted using the Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction form and synthesised narratively. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed to be of varying methodological quality. Common features of effectiveness of programs were integration of programs within existing services, provision of culturally appropriate delivery models with a central role for Indigenous health workers, and provision of support processes for communities such as transportation. It was noted however, that the programs modelled the interventions based on mainstream views and lacked strategies that integrated traditional knowledge and delivery of health care. Very few cardiovascular healthcare programs designed specifically for Indigenous Australians, which had undergone rigorous study, were identified. Whilst the majority of included articles were assessed to be of satisfactory methodological quality, the nature of interventions was diverse, and they were implemented in a variety of healthcare settings. The limited evidence available demonstrated that interventions targeted at Indigenous cardiovascular health and related risk factors can be effective. The results indicate that there are opportunities to improve cardiovascular health of Indigenous people at all stages of the disease continuum. There is a need for further research into evidence-based interventions that are sensitive to Indigenous culture and needs. Registered with PROSPERO International: CRD2016046688.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 20%
Student > Master 18 11%
Unspecified 8 5%
Researcher 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 57 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Unspecified 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 63 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,546,615
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,560
of 1,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,764
of 341,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#51
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.