↓ Skip to main content

Urban Dissolved Silica: Quantifying the Role of Groundwater and Runoff in Wastewater Influent

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Urban Dissolved Silica: Quantifying the Role of Groundwater and Runoff in Wastewater Influent
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, December 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b03516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy J. Maguire, Robinson W. Fulweiler

Abstract

Human impacts on silicon (Si) cycling are just being explored. In particular, we know little about the role of urban environments in altering the flux of Si from land to sea. Here we describe the annual load of dissolved Si (DSi) in the influent of the 2nd largest wastewater treatment plant (by volume) in the United States (Deer Island Wastewater Facility, Boston, MA). We partition the ~69,500 kmol DSi year(-1) influent load between three sources: runoff (12%), groundwater infiltration (39%), and sewage (49%). Based on these results, we hypothesized that instead of being delivered to local rivers, DSi in groundwater and runoff is redirected to the combined storm water-sewage overflow system. To test this hypothesis we compared long-term (2007-2012) observations of DSi flux from the three urban rivers surrounding Boston to modeled DSi fluxes based on land use and land cover. As predicted, the modeled fluxes were higher than the measured fluxes indicating that the sewage infrastructure of Boston diverts watershed DSi to the treatment plant. This research increases our understanding of human changes to the Si cycle, demonstrates the potential usefulness of DSi as a groundwater infiltration tracer within sewage treatment systems, and highlights the underappreciated inter-annual variability of riverine DSi fluxes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Master 6 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 23%
Engineering 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#15,735
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,135
of 395,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#140
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.