↓ Skip to main content

Multiple cameras required to reliably detect feral cats in northern Australian tropical savanna: an evaluation of sampling design when using camera traps

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple cameras required to reliably detect feral cats in northern Australian tropical savanna: an evaluation of sampling design when using camera traps
Published in
Wildlife Research, December 2015
DOI 10.1071/wr15083
Authors

Danielle Stokeld, Anke S. K. Frank, Brydie Hill, Jenni Low Choy, Terry Mahney, Alys Stevens, Stuart Young, Djelk Rangers, Warddeken Rangers, Graeme R. Gillespie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 24%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Other 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#576
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,216
of 394,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.