↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of health status do not change over three-year periods and exacerbation makes difference in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of health status do not change over three-year periods and exacerbation makes difference in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-9-112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Ferrari, Suzana E Tanni, Laura MO Caram, Cristiane R Naves, Irma Godoy

Abstract

The association between disease markers and health status (HS) overtime is unclear. The aim of this study was to verify the predictors of HS at baseline and after three years in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Psychology 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,820
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,399
of 246,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.