↓ Skip to main content

Association between chronological depressive changes and physical symptoms in postoperative pancreatic cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between chronological depressive changes and physical symptoms in postoperative pancreatic cancer patients
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13030-018-0132-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoko Sato, Yoshimi Hasegawa, Asami Saito, Fuyuhiko Motoi, Kyohei Ariake, Yu Katayose, Kei Nakagawa, Kei Kawaguchi, Shin Fukudo, Michiaki Unno, Fumiko Sato

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Psychology 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Computer Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 16 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,664,089
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#67
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,841
of 341,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them